To those who may read or hear:
, our language, has a tense that is not common among us, but it exists and opens the possibility for a better and more complex expression. This is the future of the subjunctive (it may, I come, Romans, drop), different from the present subjunctive (go, do, know, let us, whatever) and the Past Subjunctive (eat, ate, went, were, we knew, we knew), and involves a broader view of our conceptual universe.
"The limits of my language are the limits of my world" Wittgenstein
one who finds it the possibility of extending their language and to take advantage of tools that gives you your own language through the use of the subjunctive future, will be invited to join this group, opinare, furnishes information and will help to breathe life into this tense through their everyday language and not to communicate with the people who say speak "English" modern.
who considers the future of the subjunctive, as something archaic and obsolete, I'll understand and appreciate you reading this invitation. But I pray that never says that dominates their language perfectly, in fact nobody does, but some are concerned about using it better.
DIME AND I'LL TELL YOU HOW TO TALK ABOUT WHO YOU ARE
Each
tense there for us to abstract and understand time and our relationship with him. The future of the subjunctive, as its name says, speaking of what comes without much certainty; talk about the hypothetical future, the time where the dreams, goals, destiny and the meaning of life itself, its conceptual complexity and aesthetic possibilities claim that this tense was used.
Sadly, we are taught to put in place the present indicative, the most basic tense of all.
Example: If you go to your house, I'll tell you. Ex
with the fut subj: If your home, I would say.
We are also taught to use the present subjunctive to talk about something even more uncertain future:
Ex: The laws will change for citizens Ex
UNDERSTAND with the fut subj; The laws will change so that people understand to
is often also use the past tense (past) subjunctive, to refer to the future is really strange to use a verb in past talk about a hypothetical future
Ex: If I HAD / HAD win, kill the pope
Ex with the fut subj: hath If I win, kill the pope
RECOVERY MEANS
EVOLUTION Use tenses in danger of extinction, does not mean opposing the natural development language. I just think that in the process of evolution we must expand our expressive possibilities and not redurcirlas. Every day our language thrives on new foreign words that enrich us, conceptually, and that connect us to our globalized world. This is the postmodern English, which I opposed and never would, but I think we can be proud to possess a wide range of tenses and the maturity to make the effort to enrich our language, which historically have lost .
