think we can not ignore ethics, understood in its broadest sense as the knowledge about the purpose to follow. In any area where we move we need a system of rules to guide our action: the political need of some goals, supposedly valuable, to which guide the public, the scientist also has methodological guidelines that will guide their work, even the artist needs a set of rules for their creativity. Citizens also estimate values \u200b\u200bon others and this makes their lives gain one direction or another. However, as Nietzsche says, the values \u200b\u200bshould not be rigid, immovable and tight, but flexible and dynamic. In fact, the story draws on the transmutation of values. But who is responsible for laying the new ideals or viablidad review of the current? The philosophy seems no longer.
philosophy, as is now reduced to a mere transmission of ideology and values \u200b\u200bprevail, can not tackle the critical and foundational work always has returned. And it should not be philosophizing from the presumption that a particular ideal is that we must follow, but from the suspicion that indeed it is. The philosophy has to deal with continually review the viability of the regulatory purpose and not transmit them without more, as invited to do pseudo-ideological propaganda increasingly well installed in educational institutions. Do not forget, despite what is currently being done in the philosophy that underlies the philosophical foundation and knowledge leads at all times, whether we believe more obsolete or false. The philosophy is always there, as the heart of which we are unaware but which operates at all times and gives life to the body. Philosophy is the heart of science and we need to take awareness of the role that actually carries the body of knowledge so we can return to the real philosophical work.
0 comments:
Post a Comment